What it does
Compares synthetic baseline and follow-up quantitative measurements and acquisition context, with non-persistent charts and local research summaries.
Reviewing change over time requires baseline and follow-up information together. For imaging research teams, PET Response Tracker structures that information in a research workspace. It does not determine treatment response; qualified professionals remain responsible.
Compares synthetic baseline and follow-up quantitative measurements and acquisition context, with non-persistent charts and local research summaries.
Imaging professionals, research teams, and healthcare organizations studying transparent longitudinal-review workflows.
Research prototype. The public sandbox has no sign-in, saved cases or patient-history workflow. The public status does not imply clinical validation or production approval.
It does not determine treatment response, replace PERCIST or other professional assessment, recommend treatment, or create a validated clinical record.
Do not use real patient, clinical, or protected health information in a public or research demonstration. Use synthetic records unless a separately governed environment is approved.
The current public material demonstrates a proposed longitudinal workflow. It does not publish clinical-performance, concordance, outcome, or independent-validation evidence.
Review current case-study scopeQualified clinicians remain responsible for lesion selection, measurement quality, response criteria, interpretation, documentation, and patient-care decisions.
Review human-oversight principlesReview the research scope before opening the workspace, and use only synthetic information.